Deuteronomy 3:19

רַק נְשֵׁיכֶם וְטַפְּכֶם וּמִקְנֵכֶם יָדַעְתִּי כִּֽי־מִקְנֶה רַב לָכֶם יֵֽשְׁבוּ בְּעָרֵיכֶם אֲשֶׁר נָתַתִּי לָכֶֽם׃

Hebrew interlinear

Tap a word to see its entry

The same verse in five languages

Hebrew

רַ֠ק נְשֵׁיכֶ֣ם וְטַפְּכֶם֮ וּמִקְנֵכֶם֒ יָדַ֕עְתִּי כִּֽי־מִקְנֶ֥ה רַ֖ב לָכֶ֑ם יֵֽשְׁבוּ֙ בְּעָ֣רֵיכֶ֔ם אֲשֶׁ֥ר נָתַ֖תִּי לָכֶֽם׃

Greek (Septuagint)

πλὴν αἱ γυναῖκες ὑμῶν καὶ τὰ τέκνα ὑμῶν καὶ τὰ κτήνη ὑμῶν, οἶδα ὅτι πολλὰ κτήνη ὑμῖν, κατοικείτωσαν ἐν ταῖς πόλεσιν ὑμῶν αἷς ἔδωκα ὑμῖν·

Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0

Latin (Vulgate)

absque uxoribus, et parvulis, atque jumentis. Novi enim quod plura habeatis pecora, et in urbibus remanere debebunt, quas tradidi vobis,

Spanish

Pero sus mujeres, sus pequeños y sus ganados (sé que tienen mucho ganado) vivirán en sus ciudades que les he dado,

Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)

Solamente vuestras mujeres, vuestros niños, y vuestros ganados, ( yo sé que tenéis mucho ganado,) quedarán en vuestras ciudades que os he dado,

English

But your wives, your children, and your livestock — I know that you have much livestock — may remain in the cities I have given you,

What the text says

Summary

Moses tells the tribes of Reuben, Gad, and half of Manasseh that while their armed men cross ahead to fight, their wives, children, and livestock may remain behind in the cities already allotted to them. The verse explains that Moses is aware of the size of their livestock holdings, which justifies letting the herds stay in these towns.

Key words

  • rak ("only", H7535) — a restrictive adverb that isolates the group being addressed (wives, children, livestock) from the rest of the population who will proceed to battle.
  • ne.shei.khem ("wives of you", H0802H + H9026) — construct noun with pronominal suffix, forming a possessive chain "your wives," the first item in the list of those staying behind.
  • ya.Da'.ti ("I know", H3045, qal perfect) — first-person completed-action verb; the perfect aspect frames this as a settled, present state of knowledge rather than a new realization.
  • ye.she.Vu ("they will remain", H3427, qal imperfect) — third-person plural imperfect verb, indicating an action that is future or ongoing; here it is the main predicate governing the initial subject list (wives, children, livestock).
  • na.Ta.ti ("I have given", H5414G, qal perfect) — first-person completed-action verb, marking the cities as already assigned by the time of speaking.

What the text says

The Hebrew sentence begins with rak ("only", H7535), which sets apart the subjects — ne.shei.khem ("your wives"), tap.pe.khem ("your little ones," H2945+H9026), and miq.ne.khem ("your livestock," H4735+H9026) — as a distinct group. These three nouns, each in construct form with the second-person plural suffix -khem (H9026), form a chain of possession before the verb appears. The main verb governing this list, ye.she.Vu ("they will remain," H3427), occurs later in the verse (position 16), after an intervening clause. This word order — subject list first, verb postponed — is typical of Hebrew syntax placing topicalized elements before the predicate.

Between the subject list and its verb, the text inserts a parenthetical clause: ya.Da'.ti ki miq.Neh rav la.khem ("I know that livestock [is] much to you"). Here ya.Da'.ti (H3045, qal perfect) expresses a completed state of knowledge, and ki (H3588A) functions as a subordinating particle introducing the content of what is known. The adjective rav ("much," H7227A) modifies miq.Neh ("livestock," H4735) with the preposition la.khem ("to you," H9005+H9036) indicating possession. This inserted clause interrupts the main sentence, explaining why livestock is grouped with wives and children as staying behind. The verse closes with asher na.Ta.ti la.khem ("which I have given to you"), a relative clause with the perfect verb na.Ta.ti (H5414G) marking the giving of the cities as an already-completed act relative to the speech.

Differences between versions

The LXX renders tap.pe.khem ("your little ones," H2945) as τὰ τέκνα ὑμῶν ("your children"), while the Vulgate uses parvulis ("little ones"), both consistent with the Hebrew sense of dependents. The Vulgate adds debebunt ("they ought/must"), introducing a note of obligation not explicitly marked by the Hebrew imperfect ye.she.Vu, which simply indicates future or ongoing action without a modal sense of duty.

This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.