Deuteronomy 22:13

כִּֽי־יִקַּח אִישׁ אִשָּׁה וּבָא אֵלֶיהָ וּשְׂנֵאָֽהּ׃

Hebrew interlinear

Tap a word to see its entry

The same verse in five languages

Hebrew

כִּֽי־יִקַּ֥ח אִ֖ישׁ אִשָּׁ֑ה וּבָ֥א אֵלֶ֖יהָ וּשְׂנֵאָֽהּ׃

Greek (Septuagint)

Ἐἀν δέ τις λάβῃ γυναῖκα καὶ συνοικήσῃ αὐτῇ, καὶ μισήσῃ αὐτήν,

Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0

Latin (Vulgate)

Si duxerit vir uxorem, et postea odio habuerit eam,

Spanish

Si un hombre toma a una mujer y se acerca a ella, la odia,

Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)

Cuando alguno tomare mujer, y después de haber entrado á ella la aborreciere,

English

Suppose a man marries a woman, has relations with her, and comes to hate her,

What the text says

Summary

Deuteronomy 22:13 opens a casuistic legal formula describing a hypothetical scenario: a man marries a woman, has intercourse with her, and subsequently comes to hate her. This verse sets up the conditions for the law that follows (regarding accusations against a bride's virginity).

Key words

  • ki ("if", H3588A) — conditional particle introducing the legal case; marks this as a hypothetical scenario, standard in casuistic law formulas.
  • yiqqach ("he will take", H3947G) — qal imperfect; establishes the initial action of the case in a general/future sense ("if a man takes/marries").
  • va ("he will go/come", H0935G) — qal sequential perfect (vav-consecutive form); continues the case sequence after the imperfect, here functioning as a euphemism for sexual consummation ("goes into her").
  • sene'ah ("he will hate", H8130) — qal sequential perfect; the third link in the chain, marking the shift from marital consummation to the emotional/legal state that triggers the following law.
  • 'eleiha ("into her/to her", H0413 + suffix H9034) — preposition with pronominal suffix, indicating the object toward which the action of va is directed.

What the text says

The Hebrew grammar here follows a recognizable casuistic pattern: ki + imperfect verb (yiqqach) opens the conditional clause, establishing the general case ("if a man takes a wife"). What follows is not narrative vav-imperfect but vav + perfect (u-va, u-sene'ah), a sequential construction that continues the logical chain of the case rather than telling a story about a specific past event. This grammatical choice is typical of legal casuistic style in the Torah, where a series of consecutive perfects lays out the stages of a hypothetical situation that the law will then address.

The verb va ("come/go") combined with the preposition 'el ("to/into") plus the suffix "her" forms an idiomatic euphemism for sexual intercourse. The Hebrew does not use an explicit verb for intercourse but relies on this spatial verb-plus-preposition construction, common elsewhere in the Hebrew Bible for the same meaning.

Differences between versions

The LXX renders va 'eleiha ("he goes into her") with συνοικήσῃ αὐτῇ ("he cohabits/dwells with her"), a verb emphasizing shared domestic life rather than the spatial/euphemistic construction of the Hebrew. The Vulgate compresses the middle clause, moving directly from "duxerit... uxorem" ("he has taken a wife") to "et postea odio habuerit eam" ("and afterward has held her in hatred"), inserting the temporal marker "postea" ("afterward") to convey the sequence that the Hebrew vav-perfect chain expresses through verb form alone, without a separate lexical rendering of va 'eleiha.

This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.