Deuteronomy 21:16

וְהָיָה בְּיוֹם הַנְחִילוֹ אֶת־בָּנָיו אֵת אֲשֶׁר־יִהְיֶה לוֹ לֹא יוּכַל לְבַכֵּר אֶת־בֶּן־הָאֲהוּבָה עַל־פְּנֵי בֶן־הַשְּׂנוּאָה הַבְּכֹֽר׃

Hebrew interlinear

Tap a word to see its entry

The same verse in five languages

Hebrew

וְהָיָ֗ה בְּיוֹם֙ הַנְחִיל֣וֹ אֶת־בָּנָ֔יו אֵ֥ת אֲשֶׁר־יִהְיֶ֖ה ל֑וֹ לֹ֣א יוּכַ֗ל לְבַכֵּר֙ אֶת־בֶּן־הָ֣אֲהוּבָ֔ה עַל־פְּנֵ֥י בֶן־הַשְּׂנוּאָ֖ה הַבְּכֹֽר׃

Greek (Septuagint)

καὶ ἔσται ᾗ ἂν ἡμέρᾳ κατακληρονομῇ τοῖς υἱοῖς αὐτοῦ τὰ ὑπάρητις χοντα αὐτοῦ, οὐ δυνήσεται πρωτοτοκεῦσαι τῷ υἱῷ τῆς ἠγαπημένης, τὸν υἱὸν τῆς μισουμένης τὸν πρωτότοκον·

Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0

Latin (Vulgate)

volueritque substantiam inter filios suos dividere, non poterit filium dilectæ facere primogenitum, et præferre filio odiosæ:

Spanish

entonces será, el día que haga heredar a sus hijos lo que tiene, que no dará al hijo de la amada los derechos de primogénito antes que al hijo de la odiada, que es el primogénito;

Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)

Será que, el día que hiciere heredar á sus hijos lo que tuviere, no podrá dar el derecho de primogenitura á los hijos de la amada en preferencia al hijo de la aborrecida, que es el primogénito;

English

when that man assigns his inheritance to his sons he must not appoint the son of the beloved wife as the firstborn over the son of the unloved wife.

What the text says

Summary

The verse addresses the situation of a man with two wives—one described as "loved" and one as "hated"—when he distributes his inheritance to his sons. It states that he cannot legally designate the son of the loved wife as firstborn in preference to the son of the hated wife, who holds the actual status of firstborn.

Key words

  • hanchilo ("causes to inherit", H5157) — hiphil infinitive with pronominal suffix "his"; the causative form indicates the father actively assigning inheritance to sons, not simply sons receiving it.
  • yukhal ("he will be able", H3201) — qal imperfect; expresses future/modal capacity, negated here to state legal incapacity rather than mere prohibition.
  • levaker ("to treat as firstborn", H1069) — piel infinitive of a root related to bekhor ("firstborn"); the piel (intensive) stem denotes the act of formally designating or making someone firstborn, distinct from simply being born first.
  • 'ahuvah ("loved [one]", H0157G) — qal passive participle, feminine; describes the wife as the object of love, marked by the definite article as a known/specific referent.
  • senu'ah ("hated [one]", H8130) — qal passive participle, feminine; parallels 'ahuvah in form, creating a grammatical contrast between the two wives.

What the text says

The verse opens with the narrative vav on ha.Yah ("it will be", H1961), linking it to the preceding case law about the two wives. The temporal clause "on the day of hanchilo his sons" uses the infinitive construct with a pronominal suffix, a common Hebrew construction meaning "on the day when he causes [them] to inherit"—describing the moment of legal distribution rather than a specific calendar day. The core prohibition uses yukhal ("he will be able") negated by lo' ("not", H3808), followed by the infinitive levaker: the father lacks legal ability to perform the act of "treating as firstborn." The direct object is "the son of the 'ahuvah," and the phrase 'al-penei ("on the face of", H5921A + H6440H) functions idiomatically to mean "in preference to" or "ahead of." The clause ends by identifying "the son of the senu'ah" as habbekhor ("the firstborn", H1060) with the definite article, clarifying that this son already holds firstborn status by birth order, which the father cannot override through preference.

Differences between versions

The Vulgate adds et praeferre ("and to prefer"), a second verb not present as a separate infinitive in the Hebrew, where the single piel infinitive levaker already carries the sense of formal preferential designation. The LXX renders the Hebrew idiom 'al-penei with a direct object construction (τὸν υἱὸν τῆς μισουμένης τὸν πρωτότοκον), lacking an explicit Greek preposition equivalent to "over/in preference to," making the comparative relationship between the two sons less explicit than in the Hebrew's 'al-penei phrase.

This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.