Deuteronomy 14:8
וְאֶת־הַחֲזִיר כִּֽי־מַפְרִיס פַּרְסָה הוּא וְלֹא גֵרָה טָמֵא הוּא לָכֶם מִבְּשָׂרָם לֹא תֹאכֵלוּ וּבְנִבְלָתָם לֹא תִגָּֽעוּ׃ ס
✦ Hebrew interlinear
Tap a word to see its entry
✦ The same verse in five languages
וְאֶת־הַ֠חֲזִיר כִּֽי־מַפְרִ֨יס פַּרְסָ֥ה הוּא֙ וְלֹ֣א גֵרָ֔ה טָמֵ֥א ה֖וּא לָכֶ֑ם מִבְּשָׂרָם֙ לֹ֣א תֹאכֵ֔לוּ וּבְנִבְלָתָ֖ם לֹ֥א תִגָּֽעוּ׃ ס
καὶ τὸν ὗν, ὅτι διχηλεῖ ὁπλὴν τοῦτο καὶ ὀνυχιστῆρας ὀνυχιστῆρας ὁπλῆς, καὶ τοῦτο μηρυκισμὸν οὐ μαρυκᾶται, ἀκάθαρτον τοῦτο ὑμῖν· ἀπὸ τῶν κρεῶν αὐτῶν οὐ φάγεσθε, ὐτῶν οὐχ ἅψεσθε.
Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0
Latin (Vulgate)
Sus quoque, quoniam dividat ungulam et non ruminat, immunda erit. Carnibus eorum non vescemini, et cadavera non tangetis.
El cerdo, por tener la pezuña hendida pero no masticar la bestia, es impuro para ustedes. No comerán su carne. No tocarán sus cadáveres.
Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)
Ni puerco: porque tiene uña hendida, mas no rumia, os será inmundo. De la carne de éstos no comeréis, ni tocaréis sus cuerpos muertos.
as well as the pig; though it has a divided hoof, it does not chew the cud. It is unclean for you. You must not eat its meat or touch its carcass.
✦ What the text says
Summary
Deuteronomy 14:8 addresses the pig specifically, stating that although it has a divided hoof, it does not chew the cud, and for that reason it is classified as unclean. The verse then prohibits both eating its meat and touching its carcass.
Key words
- chazir ("pig", H2386) — masculine singular noun, the animal named directly, marked by the object marker 'et (H0853) showing it is the topic under discussion, continuing a list from prior verses.
- mafris ("dividing", H6536) — hiphil participle construct of the root meaning to split; used descriptively of the hoof's condition, paired with parsah ("hoof", H6541).
- gerah ("cud", H1625) — feminine singular noun; its absence (ve-lo gerah, "and not cud") is the second criterion distinguishing clean from unclean animals.
- tame' ("unclean", H2931) — masculine singular adjective, the verdict pronounced on the animal, followed by hu' ("it", H1931) reinforcing the pronoun subject.
- tigga'u ("you will touch", H5060) — qal imperfect, second person masculine plural, expressing an ongoing prohibition against contact with the carcass, distinct from the verb of eating (to'khelu, H0398).
What the text says
The Hebrew sentence structure isolates the pig as the subject through the construction ve-'et ha-chazir ("and the pig"), followed by a causal clause introduced by ki ("that/if", H3588A) explaining the classification criteria: mafris parsah hu' ("it is one dividing a hoof") and ve-lo gerah ("and not cud"). The participle mafris is in construct form with parsah, a common Hebrew way of expressing "one who does X of Y." The pronoun hu' appears twice (lines 8 and 13), each time anchoring the description to the animal as grammatical subject, first for the hoof-dividing trait, then for the unclean status itself (tame' hu' lakhem, "unclean it [is] to you").
The two prohibitions that follow use parallel structure: mi-besaram lo to'khelu ("from their meat you will not eat") and u-ve-nivlatam lo tigga'u ("and in their carcass you will not touch"). Both employ qal imperfect second-person plural verbs negated by lo (H3808), giving the force of an ongoing command applicable to the community (marked by the masculine plural pronominal suffixes -khem and -m). The prepositions min ("from/any of") and be ("in") introduce the respective objects, meat and carcass, each also bearing third-person plural suffixes referring back to the class of animals like the pig.
Differences between versions
The LXX renders mafris parsah with two terms, διχηλεῖ ("cloven-footed") and ὀνυχιστῆρας ὁπλῆς ("claws/nails of the hoof"), expanding the single Hebrew participle-noun phrase into a more detailed description. The Vulgate uses dividat ungulam ("divides the hoof") and non ruminat ("does not ruminate"), where the Hebrew gerah ("cud") is rendered by a verb rather than a noun. The Hebrew text names the animal directly at the start (chazir), while the Vulgate's Sus quoque ("the pig also") and the LXX's τὸν ὗν preserve this direct naming, though the BSB and SBLIBRE integrate it differently into the sentence flow of the surrounding list.
This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.