Deuteronomy 1:36
זֽוּלָתִי כָּלֵב בֶּן־יְפֻנֶּה הוּא יִרְאֶנָּה וְלֽוֹ־אֶתֵּן אֶת־הָאָרֶץ אֲשֶׁר דָּֽרַךְ־בָּהּ וּלְבָנָיו יַעַן אֲשֶׁר מִלֵּא אַחֲרֵי יְהוָֽה׃
✦ Hebrew interlinear
Tap a word to see its entry
✦ The same verse in five languages
זֽוּלָתִ֞י כָּלֵ֤ב בֶּן־יְפֻנֶּה֙ ה֣וּא יִרְאֶ֔נָּה וְלֽוֹ־אֶתֵּ֧ן אֶת־הָאָ֛רֶץ אֲשֶׁ֥ר דָּֽרַךְ־בָּ֖הּ וּלְבָנָ֑יו יַ֕עַן אֲשֶׁ֥ר מִלֵּ֖א אַחֲרֵ֥י יְהוָֽה׃
πλὴν Χαλὲβ υἱὸς Ἰεφοννή, οὗτος ὄψεται αὐτήν, καὶ τούτῳ δώσω τὴν γῆν ἐφ’ ἢν ἐπέβη καὶ τοῖς υἱοῖς αὐτοῦ, διὰ τὸ προσκεῖσθαι αὐτὸν τὰ πρὸς κύριον.
Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0
Latin (Vulgate)
præter Caleb filium Jephone: ipse enim videbit eam, et ipsi dabo terram, quam calcavit, et filiis ejus, quia secutus est Dominum.
excepto Caleb hijo de Jefone. Él la verá. Le daré la tierra que ha pisado a él y a sus hijos, porque ha seguido enteramente a Yehová”.
Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)
Excepto Caleb hijo de Jephone: él la verá, y á él le daré la tierra que pisó, y á sus hijos; porque cumplió en pos de Jehová.
except Caleb son of Jephunneh. He will see it, and I will give him and his descendants the land on which he has set foot, because he followed the LORD wholeheartedly.”
✦ What the text says
Summary
Deuteronomy 1:36 records Yehovah's exception for Caleb son of Jephunneh, who alone among his generation will see and inherit the land he had already scouted. The reason given is that Caleb "filled after Yehovah," an idiom describing complete or wholehearted following.
Key words
- zulati ("except", H2108) — a construct noun functioning as an exceptive particle, singling out Caleb from the preceding group condemned not to enter the land.
- hu ("he", H1931) — an independent personal pronoun placed before the verb, giving emphatic contrast: "he [and not the others] will see it."
- yir'ennah ("he will see it", H7200G) — qal imperfect with a 3rd person feminine singular object suffix (-nah, H9034), referring back to ha'aretz ("the land", H0776G); the imperfect marks this as a future, not-yet-realized action.
- male ("he filled", H4390) — piel perfect of the root meaning "to fill," here used idiomatically rather than literally; the piel stem intensifies the basic sense of "fill" into the notion of "fulfilling" or "completing" one's devotion.
- acharei Yehovah ("after Yehovah", H0310A + H3068G) — a construct phrase built on the plural form of "after/behind," combined with male to produce the set idiom "filled after Yehovah."
What the text says
The verse opens with the exceptive construct zulati ("except"), which grammatically links back to the preceding verses about the generation barred from the land, immediately marking Caleb as an exception to that group. The clause "hu yir'ennah" places the independent pronoun hu ("he") before the verb yir'ennah ("he will see it"), a word order that in Hebrew signals emphasis or contrast — it is precisely he, not the others, who will see the land. The object suffix on yir'ennah (-nah, "it/her") refers to ha'aretz, "the land," maintaining grammatical gender agreement since 'eretz is feminine.
The final clause explaining Yehovah's reasoning uses the idiom male acharei Yehovah, literally "he filled after Yehovah." The piel stem of male' ("to fill") intensifies the root beyond a simple physical sense; combined with the preposition-derived acharei ("after"), the idiom conveys full or complete following, though the Hebrew wording itself only states "filled after," without an explicit adverb like "wholeheartedly."
Differences between versions
The Hebrew idiom male acharei Yehovah is rendered differently across versions. The LXX (Swete) reads διὰ τὸ προσκεῖσθαι αὐτὸν τὰ πρὸς κύριον, "because he was devoted/attached to the things toward the Lord," using a verb of attachment rather than "filling." The Vulgate simplifies to quia secutus est Dominum, "because he followed the Lord," omitting the filling-idiom entirely. Modern English versions such as BSB add "wholeheartedly," an interpretive expansion not present as a separate word in the Hebrew text itself but drawn from the sense of the idiom.
This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.