Deuteronomy 1:13
הָבוּ לָכֶם אֲנָשִׁים חֲכָמִים וּנְבֹנִים וִידֻעִים לְשִׁבְטֵיכֶם וַאֲשִׂימֵם בְּרָאשֵׁיכֶֽם׃
✦ Hebrew interlinear
Tap a word to see its entry
✦ The same verse in five languages
הָב֣וּ לָ֠כֶם אֲנָשִׁ֨ים חֲכָמִ֧ים וּנְבֹנִ֛ים וִידֻעִ֖ים לְשִׁבְטֵיכֶ֑ם וַאֲשִׂימֵ֖ם בְּרָאשֵׁיכֶֽם׃
δότε ἑαυτοῖς ἄνδρας σοφοὺς καὶ ἐπιστήμονας καὶ συνετοὺς εἰς τὰς φυλὰς ὑμῶν, καὶ καταστήσω ἐφ’ ὑμῶν μῶν ἡγουμένους ὑμῶν.
Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0
Latin (Vulgate)
Date ex vobis viros sapientes et gnaros, et quorum conversatio sit probata in tribubus vestris, ut ponam eos vobis principes.
Tomen a hombres sabios y entendidos que sean respetados entre sus tribus, y los haré jefes sobre ustedes”.
Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)
Dad me de entre vosotros, de vuestras tribus, varones sabios y entendidos y expertos, para que yo los ponga por vuestros jefes.
Choose for yourselves wise, understanding, and respected men from each of your tribes, and I will appoint them as your leaders.”
✦ What the text says
Summary
Moses instructs the people to select men described by three qualities — wise, discerning, and known/recognized — from their tribes, so that he may then appoint these men as leaders over them. The verse combines a command (given to the people) with a stated purpose (Moses' future action).
Key words
- ha.Vu ("provide/give", H3051) — qal imperative masculine plural; the root is used almost exclusively in this command form, directing the people to select or produce something.
- ne.vo.Nim ("understanding", H0995) — niphal participle, masculine plural; the niphal stem gives this a reflexive/stative nuance — not simply "wise" but "one who shows himself discerning."
- yedu.'Im ("known", H3045) — qal passive participle, masculine plural; passive form indicating men who are known/recognized by others, rather than men who know something themselves.
- 'a.si.Mem ("I may appoint", H7760) — qal imperfect with vav, 1st person singular with 3rd person plural suffix ("them"); the vav-imperfect links this clause to the preceding imperative as a stated purpose or result — "so that I may appoint them."
- ra.shei.khem ("your chiefs", H7218 construct + H9026) — masculine plural construct with pronominal suffix, literally "heads of you," an idiom for leaders.
What the text says
The sentence opens with the imperative ha.Vu ("provide/give"), addressed to the assembled people, followed by a string of three descriptors applied to 'a.na.Shim ("men", H0582): chakha.Mim ("wise", H2450, adjective), ne.vo.Nim (niphal participle, "showing discernment"), and yedu.'Im (qal passive participle, "known/recognized"). The shift in verbal stem across these three terms — adjective, niphal participle, qal passive participle — creates a grammatical progression from an inherent quality (wise) to a demonstrated behavior (discerning) to an externally attested reputation (known), though all three modify the same noun "men."
The phrase le.shiv.tei.khem ("for/to your tribes") specifies the source or destination of the selection — men drawn from or recognized within each tribe. The clause then pivots with va.'a.si.Mem ("and I will appoint them"), a first-person imperfect verb with vav, expressing what Moses will do once the people have carried out the imperative — the men chosen become the object placed be.ra.shei.khem ("among/as your heads"), using the idiom "heads" for leadership positions.
Differences between versions
The Hebrew presents three descriptive terms (wise, discerning, known). The LXX renders three terms as well — σοφοὺς ("wise"), ἐπιστήμονας ("skilled/knowing"), συνετοὺς ("understanding") — but in a different order and with ἐπιστήμονας where the Hebrew has the passive "known." The Vulgate expands yedu.'Im into a descriptive clause, "et quorum conversatio sit probata" ("and whose conduct is proven"), rather than a single adjective, offering an interpretive gloss on "known." The BSB translates this same term as "respected," while RV1909 uses "expertos" ("experts") — each translation choice reflecting a different reading of what "known" implies about these men.
This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.