Numbers 3:32
וּנְשִׂיא נְשִׂיאֵי הַלֵּוִי אֶלְעָזָר בֶּן־אַהֲרֹן הַכֹּהֵן פְּקֻדַּת שֹׁמְרֵי מִשְׁמֶרֶת הַקֹּֽדֶשׁ׃
✦ Hebrew interlinear
Tap a word to see its entry
✦ The same verse in five languages
וּנְשִׂיא֙ נְשִׂיאֵ֣י הַלֵּוִ֔י אֶלְעָזָ֖ר בֶּן־אַהֲרֹ֣ן הַכֹּהֵ֑ן פְּקֻדַּ֕ת שֹׁמְרֵ֖י מִשְׁמֶ֥רֶת הַקֹּֽדֶשׁ׃
καὶ ὁ ἄρχων ἐπὶ τῶν ἀρχόντων τῶν Λευειτῶν Ἐλεαζὰρ ὁ υἱὸς Ἀαρὼν τοῦ ἱερέως, " καθεσταμένος φυλάσσειν τὰς φυλακὰς τῶν ἁγίων.
Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0
Latin (Vulgate)
Princeps autem principum Levitarum Eleazar filius Aaron sacerdotis, erit super excubitores custodiæ sanctuarii.
Eleazar, hijo del sacerdote Aarón, será el jefe de los líderes de los levitas, y supervisará a los encargados de cuidar el santuario.
Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)
Y el principal de los jefes de los Levitas será Eleazar, hijo de Aarón el sacerdote, prepósito de los que tienen la guarda del santuario.
The chief of the leaders of the Levites was Eleazar son of Aaron the priest; he oversaw those responsible for the duties of the sanctuary. The Merarites (Numbers 4:29–33; 1 Chronicles 23:21–23)
✦ What the text says
Summary
The verse identifies Eleazar, son of Aaron the priest, as the chief over the leaders of the Levites, and states that he holds the oversight of those who keep the duty of the holy place.
Key words
- ne.Si' ("[the] leader of", H5387A) — masculine singular construct noun, opening a construct chain that establishes Eleazar's rank as chief over other chiefs.
- ne.si.'Ei ("[the] leaders of", H5387A) — plural construct of the same noun, forming the phrase "leader of the leaders," a superlative-type construction indicating supremacy within the group.
- pe.ku.Dat ("[the] oversight of", H6486) — feminine singular construct noun from a root related to appointing/counting, introducing what Eleazar's authority actually consists of.
- sho.me.Rei ("[the] keepers of", H8104H) — qal participle, masculine plural construct, describing an ongoing group action ("those who keep") rather than a static title, and placed in construct with the following noun.
- mish.Me.ret ("[the] duty of", H4931) — feminine singular construct noun paired with ha.Ko.desh ("holy place", H6944G), specifying the object of the guarding duty.
What the text says
The Hebrew sentence is built entirely on chained construct phrases (semikhut). The first chain, ne.Si' ne.si.'Ei ha.Le.vi ("leader of the leaders of the Levite[s]"), places Eleazar's title before naming him, so the grammar itself establishes hierarchy before identity: he is leader over leaders. His personal identification follows in apposition — 'El'azar ben-'Aharon ha.Kohen ("Eleazar son of Aaron the priest") — anchoring his authority in genealogy and priestly status rather than in a separate verbal clause.
The second half of the verse has no finite verb; it continues as a noun phrase, peQudat shomeRei mishMeret ha.Qodesh ("the oversight of the keepers of the duty of the holy place"). This creates a second, nested construct chain: "oversight" governs "keepers," which governs "duty," which governs "the holy place." The participle shomeRei ("keepers of") functions as a substantive within the chain, referring to the group performing guard duty, not to a single event of guarding. Because there is no verb "to be" in the Hebrew, translators must supply one (e.g., "he oversaw," "will be") to render the phrase as a full sentence in English or Spanish.
Differences between versions
The LXX renders the opening title with two distinct terms, archōn and archontōn ("ruler... of the rulers"), and adds a participle, kathestamenos ("having been appointed"), which is not present as a separate word in the Hebrew construct chain — the Hebrew expresses this appointment relationship purely through construct-noun syntax (peQudat, "oversight of"). The Vulgate similarly inserts the verb erit ("he will be"), turning the Hebrew's verbless noun phrase into an explicit future-tense clause. The BSB and SBLIBRE likewise supply verbs ("was," "oversaw," "supervisará") absent in the Hebrew construct construction.
This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.