Numbers 14:44
וַיַּעְפִּלוּ לַעֲלוֹת אֶל־רֹאשׁ הָהָר וַאֲרוֹן בְּרִית־יְהוָה וּמֹשֶׁה לֹא־מָשׁוּ מִקֶּרֶב הַֽמַּחֲנֶֽה׃
✦ Hebrew interlinear
Tap a word to see its entry
✦ The same verse in five languages
וַיַּעְפִּ֕לוּ לַעֲל֖וֹת אֶל־רֹ֣אשׁ הָהָ֑ר וַאֲר֤וֹן בְּרִית־יְהוָה֙ וּמֹשֶׁ֔ה לֹא־מָ֖שׁוּ מִקֶּ֥רֶב הַֽמַּחֲנֶֽה׃
καὶ διαβιασάμενοι ἀνέβησαν ἐπὶ τὴν κορυφὴν τοῦ ὄρους· ἡ δὲ κιβωτὸς τῆς διαθήκης κυρίου καὶ Μωυσῆς οὐκ ἐκινήθησαν ἐκ τῆς παρ’ ἐμβολὴ
Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0
Latin (Vulgate)
At illi contenebrati ascenderunt in verticem montis. Arca autem testamenti Domini et Moyses non recesserunt de castris.
A pesar de esto, se atrevieron a subir a la zona montañosa, aunque ni el arca del pacto de Yehová ni Moisés se movieron del campamento.
Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)
Sin embargo, se obstinaron en subir á la cima del monte: mas el arca de la alianza de Jehová, y Moisés, no se apartaron de en medio del campo.
But they dared to go up to the ridge of the hill country, though neither Moses nor the ark of the covenant of the LORD moved from the camp.
✦ What the text says
Summary
The verse narrates that the people presumed to go up toward the top of the hill country, while the ark of the covenant of Yehovah and Moses did not depart from the middle of the camp. The Hebrew sets up a contrast between the people's unauthorized action and the stationary ark and Moses.
Key words
- ya'pilu ("they presumed", H6075B) — hiphil (causative) narrative verb; the causative stem conveys a willful, self-driven action, often rendered "acted presumptuously" or "dared" rather than a neutral "went."
- la'alot ("to go up", H5927G) — qal infinitive construct with prefixed la ("to"), expressing purpose or result: "in order to go up."
- rosh ha-har ("top of the hill country", H7218I + H2022H) — construct chain, rosh ("top of...") governing ha-har ("the hill country"), specifying the destination as the summit, not merely the hill.
- aron berit-Yehovah ("ark of the covenant of Yehovah", H0727 + H1285 + H3068G) — double construct chain: aron ("ark of...") governs berit ("covenant of..."), which governs Yehovah, forming a single compound title.
- mashu ("they departed", H4185) — qal perfect, marking a completed (or in this negated case, non-completed) action: "they did not depart," describing the fixed state of the ark and Moses throughout the event.
What the text says
The verse opens with the narrative va ("and") attached to ya'pilu ("they presumed", H6075B), a hiphil form that carries a causative or intensive nuance beyond a simple "they went." This verb form implies the subjects acted on their own initiative, pushing forward despite circumstances, which is then specified by the infinitive la'alot ("to go up", H5927G) — the purpose of their presumption was ascent el rosh ha-har ("to the top of the hill country"), a construct phrase naming the exact destination as the summit.
The second half of the verse pivots with va ("and") introducing a new subject: aron berit-Yehovah u-Mosheh ("the ark of the covenant of Yehovah and Moses"). This is a compound subject formed by a double construct chain (aron → berit → Yehovah) joined by u ("and") to the personal name Mosheh. The predicate lo mashu ("they did not depart", H3808 + H4185) uses the negated qal perfect of mashu, indicating that, in contrast to the people's movement toward the hill, the ark and Moses remained fixed mi-qerev ha-machaneh ("from the midst of the camp"). The construct qerev ("midst of...", H7130G) locates them specifically at the camp's center, reinforcing the spatial contrast between the people's outward, upward movement and the ark/Moses's stationary position within the camp.
Differences between versions
The LXX renders ya'pilu ("they presumed") with diabiasamenoi ("having forced their way" or "having pressed violently"), emphasizing forceful action, while the Vulgate uses contenebrati ("darkened" or "blinded," from a root meaning "to be in darkness"), a rendering that diverges notably from the Hebrew's causative sense of presumption and from the LXX's emphasis on force.
This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.