Leviticus 8:4

וַיַּעַשׂ מֹשֶׁה כַּֽאֲשֶׁר צִוָּה יְהוָה אֹתוֹ וַתִּקָּהֵל הָֽעֵדָה אֶל־פֶּתַח אֹהֶל מוֹעֵֽד׃

Hebrew interlinear

Tap a word to see its entry

The same verse in five languages

Hebrew

וַיַּ֣עַשׂ מֹשֶׁ֔ה כַּֽאֲשֶׁ֛ר צִוָּ֥ה יְהוָ֖ה אֹת֑וֹ וַתִּקָּהֵל֙ הָֽעֵדָ֔ה אֶל־פֶּ֖תַח אֹ֥הֶל מוֹעֵֽד׃

Greek (Septuagint)

καὶ ἐποίησεν Μωυσῆς ὃν τρόπον συνέταξεν αὐτῷ Κύριος, καὶ ἐξεκκλησίασεν τὴν συναγωγὴν ἐπὶ τὴν θύραν τῆς σκηνῆς τοῦ μαρτυρίου.

Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0

Latin (Vulgate)

Fecit Moyses ut Dominus imperaverat. Congregataque omni turba ante fores tabernaculi,

Spanish

Moisés hizo lo que Yehová le ordenó, y la comunidad se reunió a la entrada de la Tienda del Encuentro.

Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)

Hizo, pues, Moisés como Jehová le mandó, y juntóse la congregación á la puerta del tabernáculo del testimonio.

English

So Moses did as the LORD had commanded him, and the assembly gathered at the entrance to the Tent of Meeting.

What the text says

Summary

The verse reports that Moses carried out an action exactly as Yehovah (H3068G) had instructed him, and that the congregation gathered at the entrance of the Tent of Meeting. It functions as a transition line, closing the command sequence from earlier chapters and opening the enactment scene of chapter 8.

Key words

  • va-Ya'as ("and he did", H6213A) — qal verb with narrative vav, marking the next event in the story chain; simple (non-intensive) stem indicates straightforward execution of an action, not repeated or emphatic action.
  • tzivvah ("he had commanded", H6680) — piel perfect, an intensive/causative stem often used for authoritative commanding; the perfect aspect marks this command as prior and completed relative to Moses' action.
  • ka'asher ("just as", H0834D with H9004) — relative particle plus preposition, forming a comparative clause that ties Moses' action directly to the content of the prior command, expressing exact correspondence rather than approximation.
  • tikkahel ("it assembled", H6950) — niphal (passive/reflexive) verb with narrative vav; the congregation is grammatically the subject that "gathers itself," not an object gathered by someone else, though the agent of the gathering is not specified in this clause.
  • ha'edah ("the congregation", H5712) — feminine singular noun with definite article, referring to a defined, singular collective body, matching the feminine verb form of tikkahel.

What the text says

The verse divides into two clauses joined by narrative vav chains, a typical structure for sequential biblical narrative. The first clause, va-ya'as Mosheh ka'asher tzivvah Yehovah oto ("and Moses did as Yehovah commanded him"), uses the qal verb ya'as ("he did", H6213A) for Moses' action, contrasted with the piel perfect tzivvah ("he had commanded", H6680) for Yehovah's prior instruction. The piel stem of tzivvah carries an inherently authoritative or intensive nuance, distinguishing the giving of command from the simple execution reported for Moses. The direct object marker oto (H0853 + H9033, "him") clarifies that Moses himself was the one instructed, not a general audience.

The second clause shifts subject to ha'edah ("the congregation", H5712), a feminine singular collective noun, with the niphal verb tikkahel ("it assembled", H6950). The niphal stem here presents the gathering as something the congregation itself undergoes or performs reflexively, without naming an external agent who assembled them. The prepositional phrase el-petach 'ohel mo'ed ("to the entrance of the tent of meeting") uses two construct nouns (petach, H6607, and 'ohel, H0168G) stacked before mo'ed (H4150I), producing a chain of possession: "entrance-of tent-of meeting."

Differences between versions

The LXX renders tikkahel with exekklesiasen ("he assembled/called together"), an active verb, where the Hebrew tikkahel is niphal (reflexive/passive, "it assembled itself"); this shifts the grammatical subject implication from the congregation acting on itself to a possible external assembling action. The Vulgate's congregata ("having been gathered") similarly uses a passive participle, closer to the niphal sense of the Hebrew than the LXX's active verb.

This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.