Genesis 49:4

פַּחַז כַּמַּיִם אַל־תּוֹתַר כִּי עָלִיתָ מִשְׁכְּבֵי אָבִיךָ אָז חִלַּלְתָּ יְצוּעִי עָלָֽה׃ פ

Hebrew interlinear

Tap a word to see its entry

The same verse in five languages

Hebrew

פַּ֤חַז כַּמַּ֙יִם֙ אַל־תּוֹתַ֔ר כִּ֥י עָלִ֖יתָ מִשְׁכְּבֵ֣י אָבִ֑יךָ אָ֥ז חִלַּ֖לְתָּ יְצוּעִ֥י עָלָֽה׃ פ

Greek (Septuagint)

ἐξύβρισας ὡς ὕδωρ, μὴ ἐκζέσῃς. ἀνέβης γὰρ ἐπ’ τὴν κοιτην του πατρός σου· τότε ἐμίανας τὴν στρωμνὴν οὗ ἀνέβης. ἐμίανας τὴν στρωμνὴν οὗ ἀνέβης.

Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0

Latin (Vulgate)

Effusus es sicut aqua, non crescas: quia ascendisti cubile patris tui, et maculasti stratum ejus.

Spanish

Pero eres incontrolable como el agua, y ya no serás el primero, porque te acostaste en la cama de tu padre; deshonraste mi propio lecho.

Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)

Corriente como las aguas, no seas el principal; por cuanto subiste al lecho de tu padre: entonces te envileciste, subiendo á mi estrado.

English

Uncontrolled as the waters, you will no longer excel, because you went up to your father’s bed, onto my couch, and defiled it.

What the text says

Summary

Genesis 49:4 is part of Jacob's oracle over his son Reuben, describing him with the image of uncontrollable water and stating that because he "went up" onto his father's bed, he will not hold pre-eminence. The verse ends by naming the violated place as "my couch," marking a shift to Jacob speaking in his own voice about the offense.

Key words

  • pachaz ("destructiveness", H6349) — a bare noun placed at the very start of the verse, functioning as a predicate without a linking verb, describing Reuben's character directly through metaphor with water.
  • totar ("you excel", H3498) — hiphil (causative) jussive form; combined with the negative particle 'al (H0408), it expresses a wish or injunction ("may you not..."), not a simple future statement.
  • 'aliyta ("you went up", H5927G) — qal perfect, 2nd person masculine; marks a completed action and is introduced by ki (H3588A), giving the reason for the preceding prohibition.
  • chillalta ("you profaned", H2490H) — piel (intensive) perfect; the doubled/intensive stem marks the violation as thorough, in contrast to the plain qal stem used for "going up."
  • 'alah ("he went up", H5927G) — qal perfect, but in the 3rd person masculine, unlike the earlier 2nd-person 'aliyta; it closes the verse without a stated subject matching "you."

What the text says

The verse opens with a nominal metaphor, pachaz "like water" (ka-mayim, H4325G), with no verb connecting the two — Reuben's quality is simply equated with water's uncontained motion. This is followed by a jussive prohibition ('al-totar, "may you not excel/have pre-eminence") built on the hiphil stem, which typically marks causing or bringing about a state — here the causative sense of "excelling" or "surpassing" is what is being denied. A causal clause introduced by ki ("for") gives the grounds: 'aliyta mishkevei 'avikha, "you went up [to] the beds of your father," using the construct chain mishkevei...'avikha ("beds of your-father") to specify possession. The adverb 'az ("then") introduces the consequence, phrased in the more intensive piel stem chillalta ("you profaned"), contrasting with the plain qal used for "going up." The final words, yetzu'i 'alah ("my couch, he went up"), shift the pronoun to first person ("my") — Jacob now speaks of his own bed — but the verb 'alah stays in the 3rd person masculine singular, not matching the 2nd-person address used earlier in the verse.

Differences between versions

The Hebrew's closing verb 'alah is 3rd person ("he went up"), leaving its subject grammatically unstated relative to the addressed "you." The LXX renders this final clause as a relative construction, "οὗ ἀνέβης" ("where you went up"), keeping the 2nd person consistent throughout. The Vulgate condenses the final two Hebrew units (yetzu'i, "my couch," and 'alah, "he went up") into a single clause, "maculasti stratum ejus" ("you defiled his bed"), using "his" (ejus) rather than reproducing the Hebrew's first-person suffix on yetzu'i ("my couch," H3326A + H9020), and does not render 'alah as a separate verb at all.

This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.