Genesis 48:11
וַיֹּאמֶר יִשְׂרָאֵל אֶל־יוֹסֵף רְאֹה פָנֶיךָ לֹא פִלָּלְתִּי וְהִנֵּה הֶרְאָה אֹתִי אֱלֹהִים גַּם אֶת־זַרְעֶֽךָ׃
✦ Hebrew interlinear
Tap a word to see its entry
✦ The same verse in five languages
וַיֹּ֤אמֶר יִשְׂרָאֵל֙ אֶל־יוֹסֵ֔ף רְאֹ֥ה פָנֶ֖יךָ לֹ֣א פִלָּ֑לְתִּי וְהִנֵּ֨ה הֶרְאָ֥ה אֹתִ֛י אֱלֹהִ֖ים גַּ֥ם אֶת־זַרְעֶֽךָ׃
καὶ εἶπεν Ἰσραὴλ πρὸς Ἰωσήφ ἰδοὺ τοῦ προσώπου σου οὐκ ἐστερήθην, καὶ ἰδοὺ ἔδειξέν μοι ὁ θεὸς καὶ τὸ σπέρμα σου,
Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0
Latin (Vulgate)
dixit ad filium suum: Non sum fraudatus aspectu tuo: insuper ostendit mihi Deus semen tuum.
Luego Israel le dijo a José: “Nunca pensé que volvería a ver tu rostro, ¡y resulta que Dios me ha permitido ver también a tus hijos!”
Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)
Y dijo Israel á José: No pensaba yo ver tu rostro, y he aquí Dios me ha hecho ver también tu simiente.
“ I never expected to see your face again,” Israel said to Joseph, “ but now God has let me see your children as well.”
✦ What the text says
Summary
Israel tells Joseph that he had not expected to see his face again, and states that God has additionally shown him Joseph's offspring. The verse marks Jacob's (Israel's) emotional reaction upon reuniting with his son and grandsons.
Key words
pilalti ("I judged", H6419) — piel perfect, first person. The root normally carries the sense of judging or intervening, but combined with the preceding infinitive and negation it functions here as an idiom for "I did not expect / did not dare hope."
re'oh ("to see", H7200) — infinitive construct, placed at the head of the clause before the negation lo ("not", H3808). This fronting gives the sense "as for seeing your face, I did not expect [it]."
paneikha ("your face", H6440) — masculine plural noun in construct with the pronominal suffix -kha ("your", H9021). Hebrew treats "face" as grammatically plural even when referring to a single face.
her'ah ("he has shown", H7200) — hiphil perfect of the same root as re'oh. The hiphil (causative) stem turns "to see" into "to cause to see," i.e., "to show."
zar'akha ("your offspring", H2233) — masculine singular noun in construct with -kha ("your"). Though singular in form, zera' regularly denotes descendants collectively.
What the text says
The verse opens with the narrative formula vayomer Yisra'el el-Yosef ("and Israel said to Joseph", H0559/H3478/H0413/H3130), introducing direct speech. The first clause, re'oh paneikha lo pilalti, places the infinitive construct re'oh ("to see", H7200) before the negation lo ("not", H3808) and the finite verb pilalti ("I judged", H6419). This word order — object-infinitive first, negated verb last — is a Hebrew syntactic pattern that throws emphasis onto the act of seeing itself: literally "seeing your face, I did not judge/reckon [on]." The piel verb pilalti, whose root elsewhere concerns judgment or intercession, here operates idiomatically to express expectation or hope, a nuance a flat translation of "judge" would obscure.
The second clause is introduced by the interjection hineh ("here!", H2009), which draws attention to the ensuing statement, followed by the hiphil perfect her'ah ("he has shown", H7200) — the causative counterpart of the infinitive re'oh used earlier, creating a wordplay between "I did not expect to see" and "God has caused me to see." The direct object marker 'et (H0853, untranslated) introduces both oti ("me", H9030) and zar'akha ("your offspring", H2233), joined by gam ("also", H1571), extending the object of seeing beyond Joseph himself to his descendants.
Differences between versions
The Hebrew verb pilalti ("I judged/expected", H6419) is active and cognitively framed ("I did not reckon on..."). The LXX renders this with a passive construction, οὐκ ἐστερήθην ("I was not deprived"), and the Vulgate similarly uses non sum fraudatus ("I was not defrauded/cheated"). Both Greek and Latin versions shift the idiom from an internal expectation ("I did not think/hope") to an external deprivation ("I was not denied/cheated of it"), describing the same event through a different verbal frame than the Hebrew original.
This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.