Genesis 24:54

וַיֹּאכְלוּ וַיִּשְׁתּוּ הוּא וְהָאֲנָשִׁים אֲשֶׁר־עִמּוֹ וַיָּלִינוּ וַיָּקוּמוּ בַבֹּקֶר וַיֹּאמֶר שַׁלְּחֻנִי לַֽאדֹנִֽי׃

Hebrew interlinear

Tap a word to see its entry

The same verse in five languages

Hebrew

וַיֹּאכְל֣וּ וַיִּשְׁתּ֗וּ ה֛וּא וְהָאֲנָשִׁ֥ים אֲשֶׁר־עִמּ֖וֹ וַיָּלִ֑ינוּ וַיָּק֣וּמוּ בַבֹּ֔קֶר וַיֹּ֖אמֶר שַׁלְּחֻ֥נִי לַֽאדֹנִֽי׃

Greek (Septuagint)

καὶ ἔφαγον καὶ ἔπιον αὐτὸς καὶ οἱ ἄνδρες οἱ μετ’ αὐτοῦ ὄντες, καὶ ἑ ἐκοιμήθησαν. καὶ ἀναστὰς πρωὶ εἶπεν Ἐεκπέμψατέ με ἵνα ἀπέλθω πρὸς τὸν κύριόν μου.

Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0

Latin (Vulgate)

Inito convivio, vescentes pariter et bibentes manserunt ibi. Surgens autem mane, locutus est puer: Dimitte me, ut vadam ad dominum meum.

Spanish

Después comieron y bebieron, él y los hombres que lo acompañaban, y pasaron la noche allí. Al levantarse por la mañana, el sirviente les dijo: “Déjenme regresar a la casa de mi amo”.

Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)

Y comieron y bebieron él y los varones que venían con él, y durmieron; y levantándose de mañana, dijo: Enviadme á mi señor.

English

Then he and the men with him ate and drank and spent the night there. When they got up the next morning, he said, “ Send me on my way to my master.”

What the text says

Summary

The verse narrates a sequence of actions: the servant and the men accompanying him eat, drink, and spend the night; the next morning they get up, and the servant requests to be sent back to his master. The Hebrew presents this through a chain of consecutive narrative verbs typical of biblical storytelling.

Key words

  • yo'khelu ("they ate", H0398) — qal narrative form marking a sequential action ("and then they ate"), part of the verb chain opening the verse.
  • yalinu ("they stayed the night", H3885A) — qal narrative form; the same va- prefix pattern links this action directly to the eating and drinking that precede it.
  • yaqumu ("they arose", H6965B) — plural narrative verb; the subject is grammatically plural (the servant and the men), not singular.
  • shallechuni ("send me", H7971G) — piel imperative, second person plural, with a first-person object suffix (-ni, "me"); the piel stem intensifies the sense of "sending away/dismissing," and the plural imperative addresses the household collectively.
  • 'adoni ("my master", H0113) — construct noun with first-person suffix, literally "master of me," identifying Abraham as the one to whom the servant wishes to return.

What the text says

The Hebrew sentence is built as a chain of vav-consecutive verbs (va-yo'khelu, va-yishtu, va-yalinu, va-yaqumu, va-yomer), each introduced by the narrative va (H9001), which strings the actions into a single continuous sequence: eating, drinking, spending the night, rising, and speaking. The subject of this chain is specified only once, through the pronoun hu' ("he", H1931) joined by ve- ("and") to ha-'anashim ("the men", H0582) with the relative clause 'asher-'immo ("who [were] with him") — meaning the singular servant and the plural group of men act together throughout verbs 2–15, all inflected in the plural form.

The final verb, va-yomer ("and he said", H0559), switches back to a singular subject, though the text does not restate who speaks — grammatically it is the last explicit singular referent, hu'. This speaker issues the imperative shallechuni, addressed to a plural "you" (the household), asking to be sent la-'adoni ("to my master", H0113), using the construct form that ties "master" directly to the speaker's own identity as a servant under authority.

Differences between versions

The LXX renders the rising as a singular participle, anastas ("having risen"), where the Hebrew yaqumu is plural ("they arose"), narrowing the action to one person rather than the group. The LXX also adds hina apelthō pros ton kyrion mou ("that I may go to my lord"), an explanatory clause not present in the Hebrew, which states only shallechuni la'doni ("send me to my master") without a purpose clause. The Vulgate names the speaker explicitly as puer ("the servant/boy"), where the Hebrew leaves the subject of va-yomer unstated beyond the earlier pronoun hu'.

This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.