Exodus 33:9

וְהָיָה כְּבֹא מֹשֶׁה הָאֹהֱלָה יֵרֵד עַמּוּד הֶֽעָנָן וְעָמַד פֶּתַח הָאֹהֶל וְדִבֶּר עִם־מֹשֶֽׁה׃

Hebrew interlinear

Tap a word to see its entry

The same verse in five languages

Hebrew

וְהָיָ֗ה כְּבֹ֤א מֹשֶׁה֙ הָאֹ֔הֱלָה יֵרֵד֙ עַמּ֣וּד הֶֽעָנָ֔ן וְעָמַ֖ד פֶּ֣תַח הָאֹ֑הֶל וְדִבֶּ֖ר עִם־מֹשֶֽׁה׃

Greek (Septuagint)

ὡς δ’ ἄν εἰσῆλθεν Μωσῆς εἰς τὴν σκηνήν, κατέβαινεν ὁ στύλος τῆς νεφέλης καὶ ἵστατο ἐπὶ τὴν θύραν τῆς σκηνῆς, καὶ ἐλάλει Μωσῇ·

Greek text from Swete's edition, CC BY-SA 4.0

Latin (Vulgate)

Ingresso autem illo tabernaculum fœderis, descendebat columna nubis, et stabat ad ostium, loquebaturque cum Moyse,

Spanish

En cuanto Moisés entraba a la Carpa, la columna de nube bajaba y se quedaba a la entrada, y Yehová hablaba con Moisés.

Classic Spanish (Reina-Valera 1909)

Y cuando Moisés entraba en el tabernáculo, la columna de nube descendía, y poníase á la puerta del tabernáculo, y Jehová hablaba con Moisés.

English

As Moses entered the tent, the pillar of cloud would come down and remain at the entrance, and the LORD would speak with Moses.

What the text says

Summary

Exodus 33:9 describes a recurring scene: whenever Moses would go into the tent, the pillar of cloud would descend and stand at the entrance of the tent, and speech would take place with Moses. The verse links Moses' entry to the cloud's descent and to a spoken exchange, using verb forms that mark this as a repeated pattern rather than a single event.

Key words

  • bo ("went", H0935G) — infinitive construct governed by ke ("when"), forming the temporal clause "when Moses went/goes in." The infinitive construction does not specify tense on its own; repetition is signaled elsewhere in the verse.
  • yered ("it came down", H3381) — imperfect form. Unlike the surrounding sequential perfects, this imperfect marks the action as recurring/habitual: the cloud "would come down" each time, not on one occasion only.
  • amud ("pillar of", H5982G) — construct noun, joined to he'anan ("the cloud", H6051) to form the fixed expression "pillar of the cloud."
  • petach ("opening of", H6607) — construct noun joined to ha'ohel ("the tent", H0168G), naming the specific location, "the opening/entrance of the tent," where the pillar stops.
  • diber ("he spoke", H1696G) — piel (intensive) stem, sequential perfect. The piel stem of this root is the standard form for "to speak" in narrative Hebrew; here it continues the chain of repeated actions.

What the text says

The verse is built as a chain of four verbs linked by the narrative vav: hayah ("it was"), yered ("it came down"), amad ("it stood"), and diber ("he spoke"). The first, third, and fourth verbs are sequential perfects, the normal narrative tense for consecutive events in Biblical Hebrew prose. The second verb, yered, breaks this pattern by appearing as an imperfect. This shift is grammatically marked: the imperfect here signals habitual or repeated action — the cloud's descent is not a single occurrence but something that happened every time Moses entered the tent, as also suggested by the temporal clause introduced by ke + infinitive (bo).

The two construct chains, amud ha'anan ("pillar of the cloud") and petach ha'ohel ("opening of the tent"), each combine a governing noun with a defined noun, producing tightly bound phrases that function as fixed spatial and visual markers within the scene. The final clause, ve-diber im-Mosheh ("and he spoke with Moses"), does not name an explicit subject in the Hebrew text of this verse; the subject of diber is grammatically continuous with the preceding clauses about the pillar/cloud, without a proper noun such as "YHWH" appearing in this verse.

Differences between versions

The Hebrew text of v.9 does not include an explicit subject (such as YHWH) for the verb diber ("he spoke"); the LXX (ἐλάλει Μωσῇ, "it/he spoke to Moses") and the Vulgate (loquebaturque cum Moyse) similarly leave the subject implicit, continuing from the pillar/cloud clause. The RV1909 and SBLIBRE Spanish translations, however, insert "Jehová" / "Yehová" explicitly as the subject of the speaking verb, a specification not present in the Hebrew wording of this particular verse.

This explanation describes the text using linguistic data; it adds no doctrine or confessional interpretation.